Reasoned rejection required for import permission decisions where refusal without grounds cannot be effectively challenged.

A rejection affecting a party's eligibility or rights must disclose clear reasons so the decision can be examined and challenged effectively. Here, the communication refusing permission to import old but unused capital goods under the project import scheme merely referred to a guideline without stating the grounds of refusal, so it was not a reasoned decision. A fresh speaking order setting out detailed reasons was therefore required, and the petitioner was left free to challenge that fresh decision in accordance with law.

---

---

Issues: Whether the rejection of the petitioner's request for permission to import old but unused capital goods under the project import scheme could stand when the communication contained no reasons.

Analysis: The communication rejecting the request merely stated that the import could not be acceded to as per guideline, but did not disclose the grounds for refusal. In the absence of any reasoned basis, the rejection could not be effectively examined, and the petitioner was entitled to know the exact reasons for refusal. A fresh speaking order was therefore necessary.

Conclusion: The petitioner's grievance was accepted and the respondent was directed to issue a fresh speaking order setting out detailed reasons for rejection.

Final Conclusion: The petition was disposed of by requiring a reasoned decision on the petitioner's application, leaving the petitioner at liberty to challenge the fresh order in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi: A rejection affecting rights or eligibility must be supported by reasons so that the affected party can understand and, if necessary, challenge the decision effectively.

---