Court upholds cancellation of Letter of Permission for non-compliance with Foreign Trade Act regulations for manufacturing company.

The court upheld the cancellation of the Letter of Permission due to non-fulfillment of conditions under the Foreign Trade Act for a company engaged in manufacturing Cups and Cones. Despite the petitioner's explanations, the delay in commencing commercial production was deemed unsatisfactory. The appellate authority and Single Judge affirmed the cancellation, imposing fines for non-compliance. The court found no errors in the decision-making process and dismissed the intra-court appeal, concluding that the withdrawal of the permission was justified.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to order of cancellation of Letter of Permission for non-fulfillment of conditions under Foreign Trade Act.

Analysis:
The petitioner, a limited company engaged in manufacturing Cups and Cones for industrial consumption as an Export Oriented Unit, secured a Letter of Permission from the Director General of Foreign Trade. The Letter of Permission, issued in 2007, required the commencement of commercial production within three years. However, as of 2012, the petitioner had not started commercial production, leading to a show cause notice under relevant provisions of the Foreign Trade Act. Despite a reply from the petitioner, the delay in implementation remained unsatisfactorily explained.

Subsequently, the Director General of Foreign Trade canceled the Letter of Permission in 2013, citing non-fulfillment of conditions and failure to be deemed as deemed export. A fine and penalty were imposed for non-compliance. The petitioner challenged this order, but it was upheld by the appellate authority and the Single Judge, who found no errors in the decision-making process or the facts presented.

The court affirmed the decisions of the authorities, stating that the withdrawal of the Letter of Permission was just and proper given the circumstances. The court found no grounds to interfere with the orders of the Single Judge, the Original Authority, or the Appellate Authority. As a result, the intra-court appeal was dismissed for lacking material to support interference with the lower courts' decisions.

---