Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (10) TMI 380

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....APPELLANT (BY SRI SANJAY CHANAL, ADVOCATE)   JUDGMENT S.N. SATYANARAYANA, J. , The petitioner before the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.107971/2015 (GM-RES) has come up in this intra-court appeal impugning the order dated 13.02.2019.   2. Admittedly, the petitioner herein is a limited company having its registered office at Belur Industrial Estate in Dharwad. The petitioner-company h....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... case, it is seen that even as on 25.04.2012 the appellant company had not commenced the commercial production pursuant to Letter of Permission issued on 08.10.2007. Hence, the show cause notice was caused on the appellant on 25.04.2012 under section 14(b) and 11 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 and also under Rule 17 of the Foreign Trade (Regulation) Rules, 1993 which w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed for non fulfillment of conditions of Letter of Permission and penalty of Rs. 5,000/- for non filing of APR by the appellant herein under section 11(2) of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. 6. The said order of the 2nd respondent-the Development Commissioner was subject matter of challenge before the 1st respondent namely-the Director General of Foreign Trade, Government ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f paragraph No.2 of the Letter of Permission. Therefore, the learned Single Judge was of the considered opinion that there was no error or perversity in the reasonings assigned by the Original Authority vide Annexure-7D to the writ petition or the Appellate Authority vide Annexure-A while arriving at the conclusion rendered by them. It was also held by the learned Single Judge that no material eit....