Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the limitation for an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and not by the date on which the Code came into force or by Article 62 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Analysis: The Court reiterated that the commencement of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is irrelevant for computing limitation for applications filed under the Code. It also clarified that an application under Section 7 is not one for enforcement of a mortgage liability, but a petition by a financial creditor alleging default within the meaning of the Code. On that basis, the Court held that Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to such applications. The Court further noted that its earlier decision had to be followed in letter and spirit under Article 141 of the Constitution of India.
Conclusion: The impugned judgment was set aside and the matter was directed to be decided afresh on the footing that Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 alone applies.