Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was barred by limitation, and whether acknowledgments in writing extended the period of limitation under section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Analysis: The account was classified as non-performing asset in 2012, so the three-year period under article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 would ordinarily expire in 2015. The record, however, contained subsequent written acknowledgments and part-payments, including the agreement of 4 March 2015 and the later balance confirmation, which were treated as acknowledgments of a subsisting liability. Under section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, a written acknowledgment signed before expiry of limitation gives rise to a fresh period of limitation from the date of signature. The Tribunal applied the settled principle that limitation can be extended only in the manner provided by the Limitation Act and that a valid acknowledgment renews the remedy only for the acknowledged subsisting liability.
Conclusion: The application under section 7 was held to be within limitation and not time-barred, and the appeals failed.