Recall of insolvency admission order on limitation grounds is not maintainable; the proper remedy is appeal, not reopening before NCLT.

An application before the NCLT cannot be used to review or recall a Section 7 admission order on limitation grounds where the order is already concluded and the CIRP has progressed, including liquidation. The Tribunal treated the plea under Article 137 of the Limitation Act as an attempt to reopen its own earlier admission order and held that the proper remedy was an appeal to the NCLAT, not a recall application before the same forum. No basis was found to invoke Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, or Section 420 of the Companies Act to undo the admission order, and the application was dismissed as not maintainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the application seeking review or recall of the admission order in a Section 7 insolvency proceeding on the ground of limitation was maintainable before the Tribunal.

Analysis: The application assailed the earlier admission order by contending that the default date rendered the insolvency petition time-barred under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The Tribunal noted that the challenge was, in substance, an attempt to reopen the admission order after the CIRP had progressed and liquidation had also been ordered. It held that the proper course, if the admission order was to be questioned, was to pursue the appellate remedy before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal rather than invite the Tribunal to reverse its own earlier order through the present application. In the circumstances, no basis was found to entertain the request under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Rule 11 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016, or Section 420 of the Companies Act, 2013.

Conclusion: The application was not maintainable and was dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi: An application before the Tribunal cannot be used to reopen a concluded admission order on limitation grounds when the appropriate remedy is an appeal before the appellate forum.

---