Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was barred by limitation.
Analysis: The limitation question turned on the effect of the revival letter dated 31 January 2017 and the Second Amendment Agreement dated 31 March 2015. The revival letter amounted to an acknowledgment of liability within the meaning of section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The Second Amendment Agreement restructured the repayment schedule and fixed the first repayment date as 31 December 2015, so the default had to be computed with reference to that amended arrangement and not the earlier date treated by the Adjudicating Authority. On that basis, the application filed in September 2018 fell within the three-year limitation period. The Tribunal also noted that limitation is a mixed question of law and fact and that the petition should not be rejected by selectively relying on the record when the pleadings did not make the bar apparent.
Conclusion: The application was not barred by limitation and the rejection on that ground was unsustainable. The appeal succeeded and the matter was remitted for admission and further consideration under section 7.