Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the section 7 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was barred by limitation, or whether the written balance confirmations and revival letters constituted acknowledgment of liability so as to extend limitation under section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Analysis: The application under section 7 had been filed beyond three years from the date originally stated as default, but the record showed several balance confirmations and revival letters executed by the corporate debtor before expiry of the limitation period. Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies where, before expiry of the prescribed period, there is a written and signed acknowledgment of liability, and a fresh period of limitation then runs from the date of such acknowledgment. The Tribunal treated the acknowledgments as legally valid and binding, and held that the later confirmations extended limitation. On that basis, the section 7 application was treated as having been filed within time. The reliance placed on cases dealing with a bare default date without any pleaded acknowledgment was distinguished on facts.
Conclusion: The limitation objection failed, and the section 7 proceeding was held to be within limitation because the acknowledgments revived the limitation period.