Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was barred by limitation.
Analysis: The limitation period for an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and runs from the date of default. The application did not disclose the date of default in Part IV, and the record did not contain pleadings or material showing a valid basis to bring the claim within limitation. The documents relied on did not establish any acknowledgment of debt within limitation or any other legally sustainable ground for extension or exclusion of time. The Tribunal also found that the debt had become time-barred long before the filing of the application, even after considering the effect of prior recovery proceedings and the principles under Sections 14 and 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Conclusion: The application was held to be barred by limitation and was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: A Section 7 application must be filed within three years from the date of default, and in the absence of pleaded facts or supporting material establishing acknowledgment or other legally permissible extension of limitation, a stale debt cannot be revived for initiation of CIRP.