Court dismisses writ petition as infructuous after Revisional Authority annuls and remands for fresh adjudication. The court disposed of the writ petition seeking the quashing of an order by the Additional Commissioner (Appeals) of Haryana Goods and Services Tax (HGST) ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court dismisses writ petition as infructuous after Revisional Authority annuls and remands for fresh adjudication.
The court disposed of the writ petition seeking the quashing of an order by the Additional Commissioner (Appeals) of Haryana Goods and Services Tax (HGST) as infructuous. The Revisional Authority annulled the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the Appellate Authority for fresh adjudication. Consequently, the court found the relief sought by the petitioner unnecessary due to the actions taken by the Revisional Authority, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition.
Issues: Quashing of order by Additional Commissioner (Appeals) - Certified copy not appended - Original order appended - Revisional Authority annulling impugned order - Remanding back to Appellate Authority.
Analysis:
The petitioner, an assessee, filed a writ seeking the quashing of an order passed by the Additional Commissioner (Appeals) of Haryana Goods and Services Tax (HGST). The order in question was dated 6.12.2018 and dismissed the petitioner's appeal against the original order dated 19.4.2018. The ground for dismissal was the alleged absence of a certified copy of the original order, despite the original order being factually appended. During the hearing, the State counsel, representing the Revisional Authority under Section 108 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, informed the court that the impugned order had been annulled. The matter was remanded back to the Appellate Authority for a fresh adjudication on the merits of the appeal.
The court noted the actions of the Revisional Authority annulling the impugned order and sending the case back to the Appellate Authority for a proper adjudication on the merits. In light of these developments, the court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous, indicating that the relief sought by the petitioner was no longer necessary or relevant due to the subsequent actions taken by the Revisional Authority.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.