Tribunal grants appellant cenvat credit on outward freight service tax, citing evidence and CA certificate.

The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the cenvat credit on service tax paid towards outward freight for the specific period in question. The appellant successfully demonstrated through documentary evidence and a Chartered Accountant certificate that the credit pertained to a specific period, in line with legal interpretations and judicial precedents. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, granting the appellant relief and upholding their entitlement to the cenvat credit.

---

---

Issues:
- Wrong availing of cenvat credit on service tax paid towards outward freight
- Violation of principles of natural justice
- Interpretation of the term 'input service'
- Applicability of judicial precedents on cenvat credit for transportation services

Analysis:
1. The appeal was filed against the order rejecting the appellant's appeal regarding the wrongful availing of cenvat credit on service tax paid towards outward freight. The appellant, engaged in the manufacture of Sugar and Molasses, had availed cenvat credit on various inputs, input services, and capital goods. The original authority confirmed the demand of cenvat credit, interest, and imposed a penalty. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this decision, leading to the appeal.

2. The appellant argued that the impugned order lacked sustainability as it did not appreciate the evidence and binding judicial precedents properly. The appellant highlighted that the original authority's order was ex parte, violating principles of natural justice. The appellant contended that the service tax credit was for outward transportation service received during a specific period, as evidenced by their returns and a Chartered Accountant certificate.

3. The appellant relied on the interpretation of the term 'input service' and cited the case of CCE Vs. Vasavdatta Cements Ltd. The appellant argued that the credit availed on transportation service for delivering goods to the customer's door was permissible. The Chartered Accountant certificate supported the claim that the cenvat credit pertained to a specific period, making it admissible. The appellant also referenced other cases supporting the admissibility of cenvat credit for outward transportation services.

4. The learned AR defended the impugned order, stating that the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence, specifically a Chartered Accountant certificate proving the period to which the service tax paid on GTA related.

5. After considering both parties' submissions and the evidence on record, the Tribunal found in favor of the appellant. The Tribunal noted that the appellant demonstrated through documentary evidence and the Chartered Accountant certificate that the cenvat credit on service tax paid on GTA pertained to a specific period. Relying on judicial precedents, including the case of CCE Vs. Vasavdatta Cements Ltd., the Tribunal concluded that the appellant was entitled to the cenvat credit, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with consequential relief.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the cenvat credit on service tax paid towards outward freight for the specific period in question, based on documentary evidence, legal interpretations, and judicial precedents.

---