Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2019 (6) TMI 425 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Assessee's appeals partially allowed, remitted for fresh consideration with opportunity for additional evidence The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeals in ITA Nos. 107 & 108/Coch/2019, directing the CIT(A) to admit and consider the appeals on their ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Assessee's appeals partially allowed, remitted for fresh consideration with opportunity for additional evidence

                            The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeals in ITA Nos. 107 & 108/Coch/2019, directing the CIT(A) to admit and consider the appeals on their merits. For ITA No. 109/Coch/2019, the issue was remitted back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration with an opportunity for the assessee to present additional evidence. The order was pronounced on May 20, 2019.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Dismissal of appeals by CIT(A) without condoning the delay of 303 and 301 days for assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12.
                            2. Disallowance of VAT by invoking section 43B for assessment year 2012-13.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Dismissal of Appeals by CIT(A) Without Condoning the Delay:

                            The appeals in ITA Nos. 107 & 108/Coch/2019 pertain to the dismissal by the CIT(A) due to delays of 303 and 301 days for the assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12, respectively. The assessee attributed the delay to two primary reasons: the severe back pain of their authorized representative, supported by medical certificates, and frequent changes in the Managing Director position within the company.

                            The CIT(A) did not condone the delay, referencing section 249(3) of the Act, which allows for condonation only if "the appellant had sufficient cause for not presenting it within that period." The CIT(A) cited several legal precedents, including Ram Mohan Kabra (257 ITR 773) and Ajit Singh Thakur Singh v. State of Gujarat (AIR 1981 SC 733), emphasizing that the cause for delay must arise within the limitation period and be supported by cogent evidence.

                            Upon review, the CIT(A) found the medical certificates insufficient, noting that the authorized representative had attended a hearing before the Assessing Officer during the claimed period of incapacitation. Additionally, the CIT(A) found the explanation regarding the frequent changes in the Managing Director position unsubstantiated due to a lack of specific dates and reasons.

                            The Tribunal, however, disagreed with the CIT(A)'s stringent approach. It emphasized the validity of the medical certificates and the affidavit from the current Managing Director affirming the frequent changes in leadership. The Tribunal referenced the Supreme Court's decision in Vedabai alias Vaijayanatabai Baburao Patil vs. Shantaram Baburao Patil (253 ITR 798), advocating for a pragmatic and liberal approach in condonation matters, especially when the delay is not inordinate. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to admit the appeals and dispose of them on merits, thus partly allowing the appeals of the assessee.

                            2. Disallowance of VAT by Invoking Section 43B:

                            In ITA No. 109/Coch/2019, the assessee contested the disallowance of Rs. 4,89,48,224/- by invoking section 43B, which mandates that certain expenses are deductible only on actual payment. The Assessing Officer disallowed the VAT payable amount as it was not remitted before the due date of filing the return.

                            The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, noting the assessee's failure to provide evidence of compliance with section 43B. The assessee argued that the company was not engaged in any trading activity and thus, section 43B should not apply. However, this argument was not substantiated with evidence before the lower authorities.

                            The Tribunal, considering the assessee's request for an opportunity to present necessary evidence, remitted the issue back to the CIT(A). The CIT(A) was directed to allow the assessee to produce evidence showing compliance with section 43B. This ground of appeal was thus partly allowed for statistical purposes.

                            Conclusion:

                            The Tribunal's judgment resulted in the partial allowance of the assessee's appeals in ITA Nos. 107 & 108/Coch/2019, directing the CIT(A) to admit and consider the appeals on their merits. For ITA No. 109/Coch/2019, the issue was remitted back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration with an opportunity for the assessee to present additional evidence. The order was pronounced in the open Court on May 20, 2019.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found