Tribunal directs deduction recalculated under Section 80HHC in line with Supreme Court rulings

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to recompute the deduction under Section 80HHC in accordance with the Supreme Court's decision in Avani Exports. The Tribunal held that exporters with turnover exceeding Rs. 10 crores are entitled to the same benefits as those with turnover below Rs. 10 crores without additional conditions, as the amendments do not operate retrospectively. The Supreme Court's rulings in Topman Exports and Avani Exports were deemed binding, establishing the law to be followed by authorities.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Allowability of deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2001-02.
2. Impact of retrospective amendments by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2005 on the computation of deduction under Section 80HHC.
3. Applicability of the Supreme Court's decision in Topman Exports vs. CIT and Avani Export vs. CIT on the computation of deduction under Section 80HHC.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Allowability of Deduction under Section 80HHC
The assessee, a partnership firm engaged in the manufacture and export of cotton garments, leather garments, bags, and other leather goods, claimed a deduction of Rs. 1,56,83,432 under Section 80HHC for the Assessment Year 2001-02. The initial assessment disallowed this deduction, and the CIT(A) upheld the disallowance. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and directed the Assessing Officer (A.O) to recompute the deduction. The High Court remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration in light of retrospective amendments to Section 80HHC.

2. Impact of Retrospective Amendments by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2005
The High Court noted the retrospective amendments to Section 28(iiid) and Section 80HHC by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2005, effective from April 1, 1998. The Tribunal, considering these amendments, remanded the issue back to the A.O to recompute the deduction under Section 80HHC in light of the amended provisions and the Supreme Court's decision in Topman Exports.

3. Applicability of the Supreme Court's Decisions
The A.O, while recomputing the deduction, followed the Supreme Court's ruling in Topman Exports, which held that the profit on transfer of DEPB is taxable as business profit. The CIT(A) upheld this recomputation. However, the assessee argued that the decision in Avani Export, which invalidated the retrospective amendments, should apply. The Tribunal noted that the authorities below did not consider the Avani Export decision, which mandates that exporters with turnover exceeding Rs. 10 crores should be treated similarly to those with turnover below Rs. 10 crores for the purpose of Section 80HHC deductions.

Tribunal's Decision
The Tribunal held that the law, as settled by the Supreme Court in Avani Exports, should be applied. This decision states that the third and fourth provisos to Section 80HHC, inserted by the Taxation Laws (Second Amendment) Act, 2005, do not operate retrospectively. Therefore, exporters with turnover exceeding Rs. 10 crores are entitled to the same benefits as those with turnover below Rs. 10 crores without complying with additional conditions.

The Tribunal directed the A.O to recompute the deduction under Section 80HHC in accordance with the Supreme Court's decision in Avani Exports. The assessee was instructed to provide the necessary computations, which the A.O would verify and apply accordingly.

Conclusion
The appeal was allowed, and the A.O was instructed to recompute the deduction under Section 80HHC, considering the Supreme Court's rulings in both Topman Exports and Avani Exports. The decision of the Supreme Court was deemed the law of the land, which the authorities are bound to follow once it is brought to their notice.

Order Pronounced
The order was pronounced in the open court on May 17, 2019.

---