Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2019 (5) TMI 885 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Upholds Commissioner's Decision on Tax Appeals, Dismisses Revenue's Recall Applications The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's applications seeking the recall of the order dated 4th December 2015 under section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal Upholds Commissioner's Decision on Tax Appeals, Dismisses Revenue's Recall Applications

                            The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's applications seeking the recall of the order dated 4th December 2015 under section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)' decision on disputed additions below the monetary limit of Rs. 20 lakh as per CBDT Circular, deeming the appeals non-maintainable. The Tribunal found no mistake apparent in the order regarding additions made under section 69B for the assessment years 2005-06, 2006-07, and 2007-08, and emphasized the non-clubbing of appeals for all years. The decision was based on a comprehensive analysis of the facts and legal provisions, ensuring adherence to established principles.




                            Issues:
                            1. Recall of the order dated 4th December 2015 under section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                            2. Mistake apparent in the face of record in the appeal order passed by the Tribunal.
                            3. Clubbing of appeals for all years including assessment year 2007-08.
                            4. Addition made under section 69B of the Act for assessment years 2005-06, 2006-07, and 2007-08.
                            5. Disputed additions and decisions by the Commissioner (Appeals) and Tribunal.
                            6. Tax effect on disputed additions below the monetary limit of Rs. 20 lakh as per CBDT Circular.

                            1. Recall of the Order:
                            The Revenue filed applications seeking the recall of the order dated 4th December 2015 under section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Department contended that the Tribunal erred in not referring to the correct remand report and granting relief to the assessee based on another assessee's case. The Department also argued against the non-clubbing of appeals for all years, hindering legal recourse due to low tax effect. The Authorised Representative defended the Tribunal's decision, stating that all aspects were considered before passing the order.

                            2. Mistake Apparent in the Order:
                            The Tribunal analyzed the additions made under section 69B of the Act for the assessment years 2005-06, 2006-07, and 2007-08. The additions were based on material found during a search operation, leading to protective basis additions at the assessee's hands. The Commissioner (Appeals) later deleted these additions, leading to appeals by the Department. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision for the assessment year 2007-08, stating that the facts were identical, and the decision applied to the present appeal. The Tribunal found no mistake apparent in the order and dismissed the Revenue's applications.

                            3. Clubbing of Appeals:
                            The Tribunal noted that the Department's contention of a mistake apparent on the face of the record was without basis. The Department's attempt to seek a review through rectification was deemed impermissible in law. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) based on the facts of the case, emphasizing that the appeals were identical.

                            4. Disputed Additions and Decisions:
                            The Tribunal highlighted that the tax effect on the disputed additions was below the monetary limit of Rs. 20 lakh as per CBDT Circular no.3/2018. Therefore, the appeals by the Revenue were not maintainable under the circular. The Authorised Representative's submission regarding the tax effect was acknowledged, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's applications as recalling the appeal order would have been futile.

                            5. Conclusion:
                            In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed both miscellaneous applications, emphasizing the non-maintainability of the appeals due to the tax effect falling below the prescribed limit. The decision was based on a thorough analysis of the facts and legal provisions, ensuring adherence to the CBDT Circular and established legal principles.

                            This detailed analysis of the judgment covers the issues raised, the arguments presented by both parties, and the Tribunal's reasoning leading to the final decision.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found