Tribunal Supports Assessee in Appeal, Emphasizes Accounting Consistency

The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue's appeal on all grounds. The tribunal emphasized consistency in accounting, the non-capital nature of the DTT subscription expenditure, and the correct treatment of income. The order was pronounced on 03/05/2019.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of addition of Rs. 46,00,000.
2. Deletion of addition of Rs. 13,28,205.
3. Deletion of disallowance of Rs. 11,60,000 on account of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (DTT) subscription.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Deletion of Addition of Rs. 46,00,000:
The central issue was whether the CIT(A) was justified in deleting the addition of Rs. 46,00,000. The tribunal noted that this issue was previously decided in favor of the assessee for the assessment year 2007-08. The Revenue had challenged the deletion of an addition of Rs. 47,92,500, arguing that the unbilled portion of work should be accounted for as work-in-progress. The CIT(A) found that the amount of Rs. 47,92,500 was billed in April 2007 and offered as income in the assessment year 2008-09. The tribunal upheld this view, emphasizing that the same income cannot be taxed in two assessment years. The tribunal dismissed the Revenue's ground, following the principle that the tax rate was the same for both years, and taxing the amount in the impugned year would not affect the Revenue.

2. Deletion of Addition of Rs. 13,28,205:
The Revenue contended that there was a violation of Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules by the CIT(A) in admitting fresh evidence without giving the Assessing Officer (AO) an opportunity to respond. The tribunal noted that this issue was also covered in favor of the assessee for the assessment year 2007-08. The AO had disallowed Rs. 80,94,715 due to unreconciled reversal entries. The CIT(A) found that the assessee had reconciled Rs. 17,66,393 of the difference, leaving Rs. 63,28,322 as disallowed. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the Department could not provide evidence of fresh submissions that were not considered by the AO. Therefore, the tribunal dismissed the Revenue's ground, affirming that no additional evidence was submitted without due process.

3. Deletion of Disallowance of Rs. 11,60,000 on Account of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (DTT) Subscription:
The Revenue challenged the deletion of Rs. 11,60,000, arguing that the DTT subscription was a capital expenditure providing enduring benefit. The tribunal found that the assessee paid the DTT subscription annually to utilize the Deloitte brand and technology, which did not constitute acquiring an asset of enduring benefit. The CIT(A) observed that similar payments were allowed in previous and subsequent years without disallowance. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the expenditure was for running the business efficiently and profitably, and applying the rule of consistency, the expenditure should be allowed as revenue expenditure.

Conclusion:
The tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal on all grounds, affirming the CIT(A)'s decisions. The tribunal emphasized the principles of consistency, the correct accounting of income, and the non-capital nature of the DTT subscription expenditure. The order was pronounced in the open court on 03/05/2019.

---