Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2019 (4) TMI 1432 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal grants additional depreciation for 2011-12 and 2012-13 based on High Court ruling. AO to verify and allow 50% balance. The tribunal allowed the assessee's claim for the balance additional depreciation for AY 2011-12 and AY 2012-13, following the precedent set by the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                          Tribunal grants additional depreciation for 2011-12 and 2012-13 based on High Court ruling. AO to verify and allow 50% balance.

                          The tribunal allowed the assessee's claim for the balance additional depreciation for AY 2011-12 and AY 2012-13, following the precedent set by the Hon'ble Madras High Court. The tribunal directed the AO to verify the correctness of the amounts claimed for additional depreciation in successive years and allow the balance 50% additional depreciation accordingly, emphasizing the legislative intent to encourage investment in new plant and machinery.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Disallowance of Additional Depreciation under Section 32(1)(iia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                          2. Restriction of Additional Depreciation to 50% for assets used for less than 180 days.
                          3. Non-adjudication of fresh claim for balance 50% additional depreciation for assets acquired in the previous year but used for less than 180 days.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Disallowance of Additional Depreciation under Section 32(1)(iia):
                          The appellant, engaged in the manufacturing of printed packaging materials, claimed additional depreciation of Rs. 6,48,97,045 under Section 32(1)(iia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Out of this, Rs. 6,08,48,418 was undisputed as it pertained to new plant and machinery used for more than 180 days. The dispute arose over the additional depreciation of Rs. 40,48,626 for new plant and machinery used for less than 180 days, which the AO restricted to 50% (i.e., 10% of the stipulated 20%) as per the second proviso to Section 32(1)(iia). The AO disallowed the remaining 50%, adding Rs. 20,24,313 back to the assessee's income.

                          2. Restriction of Additional Depreciation to 50% for Assets Used for Less than 180 Days:
                          The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, stating that there is no provision in the statute to allow additional depreciation beyond the first year of use. The CIT(A) maintained that only 50% of the stipulated rate of 20% (i.e., 10%) is allowable for assets used for less than 180 days, as per the second proviso to Section 32(1). The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's contention for the remaining 50% additional depreciation.

                          3. Non-adjudication of Fresh Claim for Balance 50% Additional Depreciation:
                          The assessee also claimed additional depreciation of Rs. 29,92,833 for the preceding assessment year (AY 2011-12) for assets used for less than 180 days, which was not allowed by the CIT(A). The CIT(A) dismissed this claim, stating it did not arise from the assessment order. The assessee argued that the balance additional depreciation should be allowed in the subsequent year (AY 2012-13) as per the CIT(A)'s own decision for AY 2011-12.

                          Tribunal's Decision:
                          The tribunal dismissed grounds 1 to 3 as not pressed by the assessee. For ground 4, the tribunal referred to the assessee's own case in ITA Nos. 5403 & 5404/Mum/2016 and the decision of the Hon'ble Madras High Court in CIT v. T.P. Textiles Private Limited (2017) 394 ITR 483 (Mad.), which held that the balance 50% of additional depreciation can be claimed in the succeeding year. The tribunal observed that the amendment to Section 32 by the Finance Act, 2015, effective from 01.04.2016, clarified that the balance 50% of additional depreciation is allowable in the immediately succeeding year.

                          The tribunal allowed the assessee's claim for the balance additional depreciation for AY 2011-12 and AY 2012-13, subject to verification by the AO. The tribunal followed the precedent set by the Hon'ble Madras High Court and the tribunal's own earlier decision, concluding that the balance additional depreciation should be allowed in the subsequent year if the asset was used for less than 180 days in the year of acquisition.

                          Conclusion:
                          The appeal was partly allowed, with the tribunal directing the AO to verify the correctness of the amounts claimed for additional depreciation in the successive years and allow the balance 50% additional depreciation accordingly. The decision emphasized the beneficial nature of the provision and the legislative intent to encourage investment in new plant and machinery.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found