<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1432 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378988</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for the balance additional depreciation for AY 2011-12 and AY 2012-13, following the precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble Madras High Court. The tribunal directed the AO to verify the correctness of the amounts claimed for additional depreciation in successive years and allow the balance 50% additional depreciation accordingly, emphasizing the legislative intent to encourage investment in new plant and machinery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1432 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378988</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for the balance additional depreciation for AY 2011-12 and AY 2012-13, following the precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble Madras High Court. The tribunal directed the AO to verify the correctness of the amounts claimed for additional depreciation in successive years and allow the balance 50% additional depreciation accordingly, emphasizing the legislative intent to encourage investment in new plant and machinery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>