Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (2) TMI 1879 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal affirms assessee's right to claim additional depreciation, aligning with high court rulings. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, affirming that the assessee is entitled to claim the balance 50% of additional depreciation in the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal affirms assessee's right to claim additional depreciation, aligning with high court rulings.

                          The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, affirming that the assessee is entitled to claim the balance 50% of additional depreciation in the subsequent assessment year if the machinery was used for less than 180 days in the year of installation. This decision aligns with the interpretations of various high courts and the clarificatory amendment effective from 01.04.2016.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Eligibility of additional depreciation under Section 32(1)(iia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                          2. Allowance of balance 50% additional depreciation in the subsequent assessment year.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          Issue 1: Eligibility of Additional Depreciation under Section 32(1)(iia)
                          The primary grievance in both appeals is that the CIT(A) allowed additional depreciation on new machinery and plant acquired and installed in the first year of installation. The Revenue contends that the benefit of additional depreciation is available only in the year of installation and put to use. If the machinery is used for less than 180 days, depreciation should be restricted to 50% as per the second proviso to Section 32(1). The AO observed that the assessee claimed excess additional depreciation, leading to the reopening of the assessment. The AO relied on the decisions of the Chennai Bench and Delhi Tribunal, which held that additional depreciation is allowable only in the year of installation and put to use, and not in subsequent years.

                          Issue 2: Allowance of Balance 50% Additional Depreciation in the Subsequent Assessment Year
                          The CIT(A) allowed the balance 50% of additional depreciation in the subsequent assessment year, following the decision of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of MITC Rolling Mills P. Ltd., and decisions of the Delhi Bench in Cosmo Films Ltd. and SIL Investment Ltd. The CIT(A) directed the AO to allow the remaining 50% of additional depreciation in the subsequent year since the machinery was put to use for less than 180 days in the preceding year.

                          The Tribunal examined the rival submissions and perused the orders of the authorities below. The AO disallowed the 50% additional depreciation claimed by the assessee in the current assessment year for machinery installed in the preceding year and used for less than 180 days. The CIT(A) held that the assessee is entitled to the remaining 50% additional depreciation in the subsequent assessment year, following the decisions of various tribunals and high courts.

                          The Tribunal referred to the decision of the Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT vs. Shri T.P. Textiles (P.) Ltd., which held that the plain language of Section 32(1)(iia) read with the relevant proviso does not limit the assessee from claiming 10% additional depreciation in the subsequent assessment year. The Karnataka High Court in CIT V. Rittal India (P.) Ltd. supported this interpretation, stating that the additional depreciation granted under Section 32(1)(iia) is intended to encourage industrialization, and the proviso only restricts the claim to 50% in the year of installation if used for less than 180 days, without restricting the balance 50% in the succeeding year.

                          The Tribunal agreed with the view that the amendment made effective from 01.04.2016, which clarifies the allowance of balance 50% additional depreciation in the subsequent year, is clarificatory and not prospective. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order and dismissed the Revenue's appeals for both assessment years, concluding that the assessee is entitled to claim the balance 50% additional depreciation in the subsequent assessment year.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, affirming that the assessee is entitled to claim the balance 50% of additional depreciation in the subsequent assessment year if the machinery was used for less than 180 days in the year of installation. This decision aligns with the interpretations of various high courts and the clarificatory amendment effective from 01.04.2016.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found