Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI • Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions • Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations • Issue-wise legal analysis • Practical arguments and supporting content • Professionally structured draft ready for further review.
Exclusion of Period for CIRP Calculation: Tribunal allows application, excludes 12-day period The Tribunal partly allowed the application seeking exclusion of the period between the admission order and communication to the Insolvency Resolution ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Exclusion of Period for CIRP Calculation: Tribunal allows application, excludes 12-day period
The Tribunal partly allowed the application seeking exclusion of the period between the admission order and communication to the Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP) for calculating the total period of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). Relying on NCLAT precedent, the Tribunal excluded the 12-day period from the date of admission to the date of communication of the order to the IRP from counting towards the total 270-day CIRP period.
Issues: - Calculation of total period of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) - Exclusion of period between admission order and communication of order to Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP)
Analysis: The Resolution professional filed MA 1186/2018 seeking exclusion of the period between the date of admission order and the date of communication of the order to IRP for calculating the total period of 270 days of CIRP. The applicant argued that as per the law laid down by the NCLAT in previous cases, certain periods can be excluded for counting the total period of 270 days in unforeseen circumstances. The NCLAT had held in previous cases that the period between the admission order and the date when the Resolution Professional takes charge for completing the CIRP can be excluded from the total days permissible for completion of CIRP.
The Tribunal noted that the petition was admitted on 25.3.2018, and the certified copy of the order was issued on 6.4.2018. It was informed that only after obtaining the certified copy of the order, it was communicated to the IRP. Therefore, the period from the date of admission to the date of communication of the order to IRP was excluded in calculating the total period of CIRP. Relying on the case law and the principles established by the NCLAT, the Tribunal partly allowed MA 1186/2018 and excluded the 12 days period from 25.3.2018 to 6.4.2018 from counting towards the total period of CIRP.
In conclusion, the Tribunal's decision was based on the precedent set by the NCLAT regarding the exclusion of certain periods for counting the total period of CIRP. The exclusion of the period between the admission order and the date when the Resolution Professional takes charge was deemed appropriate, and the application was partly allowed, excluding the specified 12 days from the total period of CIRP.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter ✕
TaxTMI 
