Rectification for alleged non-consideration of reimbursable expenses failed where no apparent error in the final order was shown.

A rectification application based on reimbursable expenses, limitation and penalty was rejected because no error apparent on the face of the final order was shown. The Tribunal noted that the earlier order had specifically recorded the relevant exchange and that the appellant had been given full opportunity to present submissions. On that basis, it held that the request did not disclose a permissible ground for rectification and was not maintainable on merits.

---

---

Issues: Whether the final order suffered from any error apparent on the face of the record warranting rectification.

Analysis: The application sought rectification on the ground that the claim regarding reimbursable expenses, limitation, and penalty had not been properly considered. The Tribunal found that the earlier final order had specifically recorded the relevant exchange and that the appellant had been given full opportunity to make submissions. It held that no error apparent on the face of the final order was shown.

Conclusion: The rectification request was not maintainable on merits and was rejected.

---