ITAT Chandigarh: Appeals Allowed for Penalty Deletion The ITAT Chandigarh allowed all three appeals filed by the assessee concerning penalties under different sections for the assessment years 2010-11 and ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
ITAT Chandigarh: Appeals Allowed for Penalty Deletion
The ITAT Chandigarh allowed all three appeals filed by the assessee concerning penalties under different sections for the assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12. The penalties under sections 271AAA and 271(1)(c) were deleted as the additions on which they were based were restored back to the AO and subsequently deleted in quantum proceedings, rendering the penalties unjustifiable. The ITAT emphasized the deletion of penalties due to the restoration of additions, resulting in the favorable outcome for the assessee.
Issues: 1. Confirmation of penalty u/s 271AAA, u/s 271(1)(c), and u/s 271(1)(c) by CIT(A). 2. Challenge of penalty levied under various sections. 3. Restoration of additions by ITAT. 4. Deletion of penalties by ITAT.
Analysis: 1. The appeals were filed against the orders of CIT(A) confirming penalties under different sections for the assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12. The ITAT Chandigarh consolidated the appeals as they involved common issues related to penalty levies.
2. In ITA No.395/Chd/2018 for A.Y. 2010-11, the penalty u/s 271AAA was confirmed on additions related to bogus labour charges and unaccounted sales transactions. However, the ITAT restored the additions back to the AO, leading to the deletion of the penalties as the basis for penalty imposition ceased to exist.
3. The ITAT also deleted the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) in ITA No.396/Chd/2018 for A.Y. 2010-11 as the addition on unaccounted receipts from a resort was deleted in quantum proceedings, rendering the penalty unjustifiable.
4. Similarly, in ITA No.397/Chd/2018 for A.Y. 2011-12, the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was challenged for unaccounted receipts from a resort, but the ITAT had already deleted the addition in quantum proceedings. Consequently, the penalty was directed to be deleted, resulting in the allowance of all three appeals filed by the assessee.
5. The ITAT Chandigarh pronounced the order in open court, emphasizing the deletion of penalties due to the restoration of additions by the ITAT, ultimately allowing all three appeals filed by the assessee.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
