TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>CESTAT New Delhi corrects typo in Final Order by replacing Appeal No. 12 with Appeal No. 13.</h1> The appellate tribunal CESTAT New Delhi rectified a typographical error in Final Order No. 57493/2017 by replacing Order-in-Appeal No. ... Rectification of Mistake - typographical mistake appearing in the preamble of the said order - Held that:- The Order-in-Appeal No. DDN/EXCUS/000/APPEAL-I/12/2015-16 stands written in the preamble whereas the actual impugned order was Order-in-Appeal No. DDN/EXCUS/000/APPEAL-I/13/2015-16 - Inasmuch as the said mistake is a typographical mistake, the same is rectified and replaced with Order-in-Appeal No. DDN/EXCUS/000/APPEAL-I/13/2015-16 - ROM application allowed. The appellate tribunal CESTAT New Delhi rectified a typographical error in Final Order No. 57493/2017, replacing Order-in-Appeal No. DDN/EXCUS/000/APPEAL-I/12/2015-16 with Order-in-Appeal No. DDN/EXCUS/000/APPEAL-I/13/2015-16.ROM allowed accordingly.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
