TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the detained goods and vehicle were liable to be released on the petitioner furnishing a bank guarantee for the tax and penalty found due and a bond for the value of the goods.
Analysis: An identical issue had already been decided by the Court in an earlier division bench judgment. Following that binding view, the Court directed release of the goods and vehicle on the petitioner furnishing a bank guarantee for the tax and penalty found due and a bond for the value of the goods in the prescribed form under Rule 140(1) of the CGST Rules.
Conclusion: The petitioner obtained relief and the respondents were directed to release the goods and vehicle on compliance with the specified security conditions.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
