1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CESTAT Ahmedabad Extends Stay Order, Dismisses ROM Applications; Clarifies Filing Procedure</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad granted an extension of the stay order and dismissed Rectification of Mistake applications due to a difference of ... Extension of Stay Order - Rectification of Mistake - Held that:- Since, the final order has not been passed, the extension of stay order is granted. Rectification of Mistake - Difference of opinion - Held that:- In terms of the Honβble Gujarat High Court judgment, in the case of Colourtex V. Union of India [2005 (10) TMI 101 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD], the order wherein, there is difference of opinion among two members of the bench, and the matter referred to the third member, there is no final outcome of the case. In such a situation no ROM application is maintainable. ROM applications dismissed. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad granted extension of stay order and dismissed Rectification of Mistake applications due to difference of opinion among bench members. ROM applications can be filed after final order is passed. (Citation: 2018 (9) TMI 735 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD)