Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made towards investment in purchase of property as unexplained could be deleted on the basis that the transaction was really a gift and not a sale.
Analysis: The assessee failed to establish the source of investment despite repeated opportunities and gave inconsistent explanations at different stages. The registered sale deed recorded the assessee as purchaser and the seller as having received consideration in cash, and such registered document could not be displaced by oral assertion. The claim of a gift was unsupported by any gift deed or other evidence, and the explanation was further weakened by the remand report and the registration details. The GPA-holder was found authorised to execute a sale deed, and there was no material showing that the document was in fact a gift transaction.
Conclusion: The addition for unexplained investment was rightly sustained and the assessee's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The assessment addition relating to investment in the property stood confirmed, and the appeal was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: A registered sale deed recording cash consideration cannot be dislodged by an unsubstantiated plea of gift, and the assessee must satisfactorily explain the source of investment in the property.