Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1980 (3) TMI 64 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Assessee's Appeal Rights Expanded: High Court Ruling on Interest Levy in Assessment Orders The High Court affirmed that an assessee can challenge the levy of interest under Section 139(1) in an appeal to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Assessee's Appeal Rights Expanded: High Court Ruling on Interest Levy in Assessment Orders

                          The High Court affirmed that an assessee can challenge the levy of interest under Section 139(1) in an appeal to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) under Section 246. The Court held that the AAC has the authority to consider all aspects of the assessment order, including the power to enhance interest if necessary. Additionally, the Court interpreted Section 246(c) broadly, allowing appeals against assessment orders to cover issues beyond income, tax, loss, or status. The judgment favored the assessee, emphasizing the expansive powers of the AAC and the comprehensive scope of appeal provisions under Section 246(c).




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Appealability of an order charging interest under Section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                          2. Scope of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's (AAC) powers in an appeal against an assessment order.
                          3. Interpretation of Section 246(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Appealability of an Order Charging Interest under Section 139(1):

                          The primary issue is whether an assessee can object to the levy of interest under Section 139(1) in an appeal to the AAC under Section 246 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal concluded that it was permissible for the assessee to challenge the levy of penal interest as part of the appeal against the assessment order. This is because the levy of interest is considered an integral part of the assessment process. The Tribunal cited a decision of the Bombay High Court, which supported the view that an appeal against a regular assessment could include objections to the quantum of penal interest.

                          The High Court agreed with the Tribunal's view, stating that the charging of interest is an integral part of the assessment process unless the Income-tax Officer (ITO) chooses to determine the liability for interest by an independent order. Since in this case, the interest charged was part of the assessment order, an appeal against this order could include objections to the interest levied.

                          2. Scope of the AAC's Powers in an Appeal Against an Assessment Order:

                          The High Court examined the scope of the AAC's powers and concluded that the AAC could consider every aspect of the assessment order. This includes the power to enhance the interest if it is found that the ITO has charged less interest than should have been charged. Therefore, the AAC is not restricted to only the four categories mentioned in Section 246(c) (amount of income assessed, amount of tax determined, amount of loss computed, or the status under which the assessee is assessed). The AAC has the authority to address all findings, observations, and directions of the ITO contained in the assessment order.

                          3. Interpretation of Section 246(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961:

                          The High Court provided a detailed interpretation of Section 246(c). It clarified that this section allows an appeal against an order of assessment where the assessee is aggrieved by the determination in respect of income, tax, loss, or status. However, this does not mean that the grounds for consideration in such appeals are limited to these four matters. The clause is intended to ensure that the appeal is not purely academic or frivolous. Once a valid appeal is preferred, the scope of the appeal is co-extensive with the scope of the assessment order. The High Court emphasized that the language of the second part of Section 246(c) is wide enough to permit the agitation of the issue of interest in a valid and competent appeal from the order of assessment.

                          Conclusion:

                          The High Court concluded that the Tribunal's view was correct and that the assessee was entitled to object to the levy of interest under Section 139(1) in the course of an appeal to the AAC under Section 246. The question referred to the High Court was answered in the affirmative and in favor of the assessee. The judgment emphasized the broad scope of the AAC's powers and the liberal interpretation of the appeal provisions under Section 246(c).
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found