Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2001 (5) TMI 919 - Commission - Customs

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        EPCG export-obligation breach permits recovery of duty foregone, but interest needs express statutory authority. Failure to fulfil export obligation under the EPCG scheme allows withdrawal of the customs exemption and recovery of the full duty foregone, including the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            EPCG export-obligation breach permits recovery of duty foregone, but interest needs express statutory authority.

                            Failure to fulfil export obligation under the EPCG scheme allows withdrawal of the customs exemption and recovery of the full duty foregone, including the basic duty and additional duty component, because breach of the notification conditions revives the underlying liability. Interest on that foregone duty is not recoverable unless there is express statutory or notification-based authority, and general recovery provisions or administrative practice cannot create such liability. Modvat/Cenvat credit was denied for the CVD component because the duty had not actually been paid at import, while relief from fine, penalty and prosecution was granted on the facts considered by the Settlement Commission.




                            Issues: (i) Whether, on failure to fulfil the export obligation under the EPCG scheme, the importer was liable to pay the full customs duty foregone under the exemption notification; (ii) whether interest could be levied on the duty foregone in the absence of any express provision in the notification; (iii) whether Modvat/Cenvat credit could be allowed in respect of the CVD component and whether immunity from penalty and prosecution was warranted.

                            Issue (i): Whether, on failure to fulfil the export obligation under the EPCG scheme, the importer was liable to pay the full customs duty foregone under the exemption notification.

                            Analysis: The exemption was availed under the EPCG scheme against a valid licence, subject to execution of the prescribed undertaking and compliance with the export obligation. The notification required the importer, upon non-compliance with the stipulated conditions, to pay the duty leviable but for the exemption. The Commission held that the failure to discharge the export obligation attracted liability for the entire duty foregone, including both basic customs duty and the additional duty component, because the concession itself stood undone on breach of the notification conditions.

                            Conclusion: The importer was held liable to pay the full duty foregone, and the balance amount remained payable by the assessee.

                            Issue (ii): Whether interest could be levied on the duty foregone in the absence of any express provision in the notification.

                            Analysis: The Commission found that Section 47 of the Customs Act, 1962 applies only to interest for delay in payment of duty assessed on the bill of entry and does not authorise interest on duty that was never assessed because exemption was availed. The notification itself contained no clause providing for interest on breach. The Commission also relied on judicial authority to hold that interest on tax or duty can be levied only when there is statutory authority, and that a departmental circular or administrative practice cannot substitute for such authority.

                            Conclusion: No interest was chargeable on the duty foregone, and the demand for interest was waived.

                            Issue (iii): Whether Modvat/Cenvat credit could be allowed in respect of the CVD component and whether immunity from penalty and prosecution was warranted.

                            Analysis: The Commission held that the CVD portion had not been actually paid at the time of import because the exemption had been claimed, and therefore there was no basis to grant equivalent Modvat credit retrospectively. It further held that the then-applicable credit regime did not permit such benefit on the facts of the case. However, taking into account the applicant's disclosure, cooperation, the circumstances causing failure to fulfil export obligation, and the absence of disputed wilful evasion, the Commission considered it appropriate to grant relief from penal consequences.

                            Conclusion: The claim for Modvat/Cenvat credit was rejected, while immunity from fine, penalty and prosecution was granted.

                            Final Conclusion: The settlement was concluded by directing payment of the remaining duty in instalments, waiving interest, rejecting the claim for credit on the CVD component, and granting immunity from penalty and prosecution in relation to the settled imports.

                            Ratio Decidendi: A customs duty exemption breached for non-fulfilment of export-obligation conditions can be withdrawn to the extent of duty foregone, but interest on such foregone duty is recoverable only when expressly authorised by statute or the exemption notification; administrative directions or general recovery provisions cannot create such liability.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found