Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the reference under Section 66 could be entertained where the impugned order imposing penal interest under Section 18A(6) was not appealable under Section 30(1) and the appellate authorities merely dismissed appeals without assuming lawful jurisdiction.
Issue (i): Whether the reference under Section 66 can be entertained in the circumstances stated.
Analysis: The order imposing penal interest under Section 18A(6) was not made the subject of a statutory appeal under Section 30(1). Appeals were nonetheless filed and dismissed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Appellate Tribunal. Where no appeal lies against the original order, an appellate authority's dismissal of an appeal in a wrongful assumption of jurisdiction does not transform its order into one made under the statutory appeal provision; consequently the condition precedent for a reference under Section 66 is not satisfied.
Conclusion: The reference under Section 66 cannot be entertained and is rejected.
Final Conclusion: The High Court will not accept a reference under Section 66 when the underlying order was not appealable and appellate bodies, in the absence of lawful jurisdiction, have only dismissed appeals; the consequence is that the proposed reference is liable to be refused.
Ratio Decidendi: A reference under Section 66 is maintainable only where there exists a valid appealable order under the statute; an appellate body's dismissal of appeals, in the absence of jurisdiction to hear the original appeal, does not create a basis for such reference.