Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest under section 139(8) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be levied by the Income-tax Officer while giving effect to the appellate order, when the original assessment order contained no such levy and the appellate order did not direct charging of interest.
Analysis: The return was filed after the prescribed due date and tax remained payable on the date of filing, so the assessee could not dispute liability merely on merits. However, the levy in question was made only when effect was being given to the appellate order. In the absence of any direction in that appellate order authorising levy of interest, the Income-tax Officer had no subsisting jurisdiction to initiate a fresh levy after passing the original assessment order and had become functus officio on that aspect.
Conclusion: The levy of interest under section 139(8) was without jurisdiction and was liable to be set aside, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Interest cannot be levied while giving effect to an appellate order unless the appellate order or the original assessment retains a valid jurisdictional basis for such levy; a levy made after the has become functus officio is void.