Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an assessee who maintained no accounts could reckon any previous year other than the twelve months ending on 31 March for agricultural income-tax assessment, and whether the Tribunal could rely on the prior assessment basis of a different assessee to answer that question.
Analysis: Section 2(o) of the Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950 defines "previous year" primarily as the twelve months ending on 31 March preceding the assessment year. The alternative of adopting a different year applies only where the assessee has accounts made up to a date within the relevant twelve months and exercises the statutory option in the manner permitted by the definition. Since the assessee had no accounts at all, the statutory condition for invoking the alternative basis was absent. The fact that the joint family had earlier been assessed on a Malayalam year basis could not extend that method to the assessee in the absence of accounts maintained by him.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to reckon the previous year by the Malayalam era, and the Tribunal's contrary view was incorrect. The questions were answered against the assessee and in favour of the department.