Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods procured by a 100% EOU under CT-3 without duty payment were covered by Notification No. 22/2003-CE when they were used in the factory for maintaining required temperature and the Development Commissioner subsequently granted post facto approval.
Analysis: The material facts were not in dispute: the panels and related items were received under CT-3, used in the factory premises for the stated purpose, and the appellant obtained a specific post facto approval from the Development Commissioner for procurement of the indigenous materials without duty payment. In these circumstances, the denial of the benefit of the notification could not be sustained merely on the basis that the goods were not treated as capital goods by the lower authorities.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee and the impugned order was liable to be set aside.