Appellate Tribunal Criticizes SEBI's Penalty Decision, Imposes Rs. 16 Lac for Violating Regulations

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the appeal against the penalty imposed by SEBI on the appellant for aiding and abetting in off-loading fraudulently dematted excess shares. SEBI had earlier imposed a penalty of Rs. 1 lac, which was set aside for a fresh decision. Ultimately, a penalty of Rs. 16 lac was imposed on the appellant for violating PFUTP Regulations. The Tribunal criticized SEBI for alleged leniency towards other entities involved and for failing to penalize the depositories and the main culprit orchestrating the fraudulent off-loading. The Tribunal highlighted discrepancies in penalty imposition and dropped adjudication proceedings, remanding the matter for a fresh decision to ensure market integrity.

---

---

Issues:
- Imposition of penalty under Section 15HA of SEBI Act for aiding and abetting in off-loading fraudulently dematted excess shares.
- Justification of penalty enhancement from Rs. 1 lac to Rs. 16 lac.
- Allegations of undue leniency towards other entities involved.
- Failure to take action against depositories and main culprit.
- Discrepancies in penalty imposition and dropping of adjudication proceedings.

Imposition of Penalty:
The Appellate Tribunal addressed the appeal against the penalty imposed by SEBI on the appellant for aiding and abetting in off-loading fraudulently dematted excess shares. The investigation revealed that the appellant acquired shares from Mr. Mishra and sold them on-market, indicating a non-ordinary business transaction. SEBI had earlier imposed a penalty of Rs. 1 lac, which was set aside for a fresh decision. Ultimately, a penalty of Rs. 16 lac was imposed on the appellant for violating PFUTP Regulations.

Penalty Enhancement:
The appellant contested the penalty enhancement, arguing against the substantial increase from Rs. 1 lac to Rs. 16 lac after the initial order was set aside for a fresh decision. Additionally, the appellant raised concerns about SEBI's failure to penalize the depositories and the main culprit, Mr. Mishra, who orchestrated the fraudulent off-loading of excess shares.

Undue Leniency and Lack of Action:
The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant's contention regarding SEBI's alleged leniency towards other entities involved in similar violations. It criticized SEBI for not taking action against the depositories responsible for issuing excess dematted shares and for not initiating penalty proceedings against Mr. Mishra, the primary wrongdoer in the case.

Discrepancies and Dropping of Adjudication Proceedings:
The Tribunal noted discrepancies in penalty imposition among the entities involved and the dropping of adjudication proceedings against some violators. It highlighted the inconsistency in findings, indicating that some violators were let off despite evidence of receiving shares from Mr. Mishra. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a fair and consistent approach in such cases to uphold the integrity of the securities market.

Conclusion:
In light of the issues raised, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for a fresh decision on merits. It expressed hope for SEBI to take appropriate remedial measures to safeguard its credibility as an efficient market regulator. Despite considering imposing costs on SEBI for abnormalities in the order, the Tribunal refrained from doing so due to the appellant's involvement in aiding and abetting the fraudulent off-loading of excess shares. The Tribunal directed the Registry to inform the SEBI Chairman for necessary action.

---