Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty stated in the Tribunal's earlier order required rectification to reflect the correct reduced amount.
Analysis: The application pointed out an apparent factual error in the quantum of penalty recorded in the earlier order. On examination of the record, the Tribunal found the applicant's objection to be factually correct and corrected the monetary figure in the order.
Conclusion: The penalty amount in the earlier order was rectified by substituting Rs. 1,50,000/- with Rs. 5,000/-, and the application was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: An apparent factual mistake in the recorded quantum of penalty can be corrected in rectification proceedings when the error is borne out from the case record.