Appellate Tribunal rules in favor of appellant regarding discharge of Oxygen Gas value for medical purposes.

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the discharge of 5%/6% of the value of Oxygen Gas cleared for medical purposes. The tribunal found that since the appellant did not utilize the credit on the input service for supplying Oxygen Gas for medical purposes, they were not obligated to pay the said percentage under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant's evidence, including certificates and communication from the buyer, supported their position, and as the Revenue did not provide contradictory evidence, the tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the lower authority's decision.

---

---

Issues involved:
Whether the appellant is required to discharge 5%/6% of the value of exempted products, specifically Oxygen Gas cleared for medical purposes.

Analysis:
The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD involved an appeal against an order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) Central Excise, Vadodara. The central issue was whether the appellant was obligated to discharge 5%/6% of the value of Oxygen Gas cleared for medical purposes. The appellant argued that since they did not avail CENVAT credit on the input service used for supplying Oxygen Gas for medical purposes, Rule 6(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 did not apply to them, and thus, there was no requirement to discharge the said percentage of the exempted product. The appellant cited a previous Tribunal order that supported their position. They provided a Chartered Accountant's Certificate and a certificate from the purchaser of Oxygen Gas, demonstrating that the manpower supply service on which credit was availed was not utilized in clearing the Oxygen for medical purposes. However, the lower authorities did not consider these certificates. On the other hand, the Revenue supported the findings of the lower authority.

The Tribunal noted that a previous order had determined that if credit on the input service (manpower supply service) was not used for providing the service of clearing Oxygen Gas for medical purposes, then there was no obligation to pay the 5%/6% value under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. In the present case, the appellant presented substantial evidence, including the Chartered Accountant's Certificate and communication from the buyer, proving that they did not utilize the manpower supply service for selling or clearing Oxygen for medical purposes. The Revenue did not provide any contradictory evidence. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal with any consequential relief as per the law.

In conclusion, the judgment favored the appellant based on the evidence provided and the interpretation of the relevant rules regarding the discharge of the value of exempted products, specifically Oxygen Gas cleared for medical purposes, when credit on input services was not utilized for the said purpose.

---