Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the show-cause notice invoking the extended period of limitation and the consequent penalty under the Central Excise Act were sustainable where short duty was paid along with interest after audit pointed out the discrepancy.
Analysis: The goods were cleared to a job worker for processing and later returned and cleared on payment of excise duty. Although duty had not been paid at the intermediary clearance stage, the short payment was made good with interest immediately after it was pointed out by audit. In these circumstances, the element of mala fide intention was absent. The notice was therefore issued without justification under the extended period, and the demand proceedings could not be sustained. Since the duty and interest had already been paid, only appropriation of the amount was called for and no further penal action was warranted.
Conclusion: The show-cause notice was barred by limitation and the penalty was not leviable; the order dropping the penalty was / was upheld in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed, and the appellate order setting aside the penalty was maintained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where short-paid excise duty is voluntarily paid with interest after being pointed out by audit and there is no evidence of mala fide intent or suppression, invocation of the extended period of limitation and imposition of penalty are unsustainable.