TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal remands case for fresh decision after appeal, directs verification to prevent double benefit</h1> <h3>Cipla Limited Versus Commissioner of Central Excise Pune – III</h3> Cipla Limited Versus Commissioner of Central Excise Pune – III - TMI Issues:Appeal against order-in-original No. 23-24/2008 dated 30/09/2008 regarding denial of CENVAT credit on duty paid by the appellant for medicines manufactured by its sister concerns.Analysis:Issue 1: Denial of CENVAT creditThe appellant, engaged in medicine manufacturing, availed CENVAT credit on duty paid for drugs supplied by its sister concerns. The department denied this credit, leading to the appeal. Both parties presented their arguments before the Tribunal. Upon review, the Tribunal found the need for a fresh examination of the matter. It was agreed that the adjudicating authority should verify if the sister concerns had already claimed a refund to prevent double benefit. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case to the original authority for a fresh decision. The authority was instructed to provide the appellant with a proper opportunity for a hearing and admit fresh evidence if necessary.Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, emphasizing the importance of ensuring no double benefit is claimed and providing the appellant with a fair opportunity to present their case.
TaxTMI 