Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 3/2001 for man-made fabrics processed with the aid of power or steam.
Analysis: The dispute concerned viscose sarees and viscose silk sarees, which were treated as man-made fabrics. The relevant notification denied exemption where such fabrics were processed in a factory having the facility for bleaching, dyeing or printing with the aid of power or steam. The record showed use of a steamager for drying and use of power for mixing, and the admissions made in the statements were not retracted. The concession relied upon for cotton fabrics under serial No. 114 of the notification was held inapplicable because the goods involved were not cotton fabrics.
Conclusion: The appellant was not entitled to the exemption and the confirmation of duty and confiscation were upheld.