Supreme Court: High Court Erred in Imposing Penalty under Article 226 The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 and imposing a penalty on the assessee using non-existent ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supreme Court: High Court Erred in Imposing Penalty under Article 226
The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 and imposing a penalty on the assessee using non-existent provisions under the Act. The recovery of the penalty was stayed as a result of this decision.
The Supreme Court ordered that the High Court should not have exercised jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. The High Court imposed a penalty on the assessee based on non-existent provisions under the Act. Recovery of penalty is stayed.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.