TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to small scale exemption under Notification No. 8/2002-C.E. read with Notification No. 8/2003-C.E. when the brand name used on the goods was not shown to be owned by any other person.
Analysis: The exemption was denied by the Revenue on the footing that the goods bore the brand name of other manufacturers and that the assessee was a related concern. The Tribunal found that the precedent relied upon by the Revenue was distinguishable because there was no evidence that the brand name used by the assessee belonged to any other manufacturer. The show cause notice and the findings below also lacked material showing common ownership, common management, or other facts establishing a true related-person arrangement. The Tribunal relied on the departmental clarification that where a brand name is not owned by any particular person, its use does not disentitle a unit from small scale exemption. The assessee's own name on the product also did not amount to use of another's brand name.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the exemption and the demand and penalties could not survive.
Ratio Decidendi: A small-scale unit is not disqualified from exemption merely because it uses a brand name or mark that is not shown to belong to another person; disqualification arises only when the brand name is established to be owned by someone else.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
