High Court affirms Tribunal decision on technical knowhow deduction eligibility

The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision in a case involving the interpretation of Section 35AB of the Income Tax Act. It ruled that the deduction for technical knowhow expenses could be claimed even if the business activity for which the knowhow was acquired had not commenced. The Court emphasized that the deduction eligibility depended on meeting specific conditions, regardless of immediate use of the knowhow. As the soda ash project was seen as an extension of the existing business, the deduction was allowed. The Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal and affirmed the Tribunal's judgment in favor of the assessee.

---

---

Issues:
1. Interpretation of Section 35AB of the Income Tax Act regarding deduction for payment of technical knowhow.
2. Whether deduction under Section 35AB can be claimed when the business activity for which the knowhow was acquired has not commenced.

Issue 1: Interpretation of Section 35AB:
The High Court considered the appeal filed by the Revenue challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's judgment regarding the deduction under Section 35AB of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the essential requirements for claiming the deduction under Section 35AB were the payment for acquiring technical knowhow and the capability of using such knowhow for the business, regardless of whether it was actually put to use. The Revenue contended that the deduction should only be claimed from the profit and gain of the business for which the knowhow was acquired.

Issue 2: Commencement of Business Activity:
The case involved an assessee company engaged in manufacturing soaps, which had expended amounts for acquiring technical knowhow to set up a new manufacturing unit of soda ash. The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction as the soda ash project had not commenced. The Tribunal, citing a previous decision, held that the business not starting was irrelevant for claiming the deduction under Section 35AB. The Court noted that the setting up of the soda ash plant was an extension of the existing soap manufacturing business, and therefore, the deduction could not be denied.

Conclusion:
The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing that the exemption under Section 35AB allowed for the deduction of technical knowhow expenses when certain conditions were met, irrespective of whether the knowhow was put to use immediately. As the setting up of the soda ash unit was considered an extension of the existing soap manufacturing business, the deduction could not be denied. The Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal and confirmed the Tribunal's judgment in favor of the assessee.

---