Transmission of shares and rectification of register allowed, with notice required before transferring disputed shares.

A petition for transmission of shares and rectification of the register was treated as falling under Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013, and no specific limitation period applied to transmission claims; the Tribunal applied the Limitation Act through Section 433 and held the petition timely because it was filed within three years of the company's refusal. The petitioners, having produced a succession certificate, were entitled to transmission of the deceased member's shares, and the company had no valid ground to refuse transfer of the first batch. For the 11 disputed shares, transmission was made conditional on notice to the competing claimant and absence of objection within the stipulated time.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the petition for transmission of shares and rectification of the register of members was barred by limitation. (ii) Whether the petitioners were entitled to transmission of the disputed equity shares in their favour.

Issue (i): Whether the petition for transmission of shares and rectification of the register of members was barred by limitation.

Analysis: The relief sought was for transmission of shares, which was held to fall under Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013. No specific limitation period is prescribed for such transmission, and the Tribunal applied the Limitation Act by reference to Section 433 of the Companies Act, 2013. In the facts found, the cause of action was taken as arising from the company's response dated 11.06.2012, and the petition filed on 22.10.2013 was within three years under Articles 113 and 137.

Conclusion: The petition was not barred by limitation.

Issue (ii): Whether the petitioners were entitled to transmission of the disputed equity shares in their favour.

Analysis: The Tribunal found that the petitioners had obtained a succession certificate in respect of the shares held by the deceased and that the company had no sustainable basis to refuse transmission of the first batch of shares. As to the 11 shares subject to a competing claim, the company was directed to issue notice to the alleged claimant before effecting transmission, and transmission was to proceed only if no objection was raised within the stipulated time. The remaining batch of bonus shares stood in the names of the petitioners and was directed to be transmitted accordingly.

Conclusion: The petitioners were entitled to transmission of the shares, subject to notice and objection rights in respect of the 11 disputed shares.

Final Conclusion: The petition succeeded and the company was directed to effect transmission of the shares in accordance with the stated directions, with limited protection for the competing claimant in respect of the disputed 11 shares.

Ratio Decidendi: A petition for transmission of shares under the Companies Act is governed by the limitation law only to the extent a cause of action accrues, and where the applicant holds a succession certificate and the company has no valid ground to refuse transmission, the register of members must be corrected, subject to resolution of any specific competing claim.

---