TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal Dismissed for Delay: Insufficient Reasons, Barred by Limitation</h1> <h3>AM Ahmed & Co. Versus CCE Tirunelveli</h3> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai dismissed the appeal for condonation of delay of 25 days, citing insufficient reasons for the delay. Consequently, ... Condonation of delay of 25 days in filing an appeal – appellant submits that delay was caused due to that General Manager of the partnership firm who is looking after the affairs had suffered an attack of Infective Hepatitis – found that firm has 20 partners – explanation for delay is not sufficient to condone delay – appeal dismissed. The appeal for condonation of delay of 25 days was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai as the reason provided for the delay was not considered sufficient. The delay in filing the appeal was not condoned, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as barred by limitation.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
