Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the 5% limit for clearance of rejects and waste by a 100% EOU under the EXIM Policy is to be computed product-wise or with reference to the total production of the unit, and whether duty demand on the excess clearance was sustainable.
Analysis: Paragraph 9.9 of the EXIM Policy was read as permitting clearance of rejects up to 5% of the value of production without indicating that the limit must be applied separately to each product manufactured by a 100% EOU. The policy was found to create no conscious product-wise restriction, and the Development Commissioner's later clarification stated that entitlement to the 5% limit is to be determined in totality and not by reference to specific items. The record also showed that higher reject percentages could be permitted with approval, and there was no finding that the rejects were artificially or falsely inflated.
Conclusion: The 5% rejects limit was held to apply to the total production of the unit and not separately to each product. The duty demand was not upheld and the department's appeals failed.