Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to refund under Notification No. 56/02-CE dated 14.11.2002 despite the reliance placed on Notification No. 19/08-CE dated 27.3.2008.
Analysis: The appellant was availing the benefit of the exemption notification applicable in Jammu and Kashmir and claimed refund of duty paid through PLA. The denial of refund rested only on Notification No. 19/08-CE dated 27.3.2008. The appellant produced the order of the High Court showing that the operation of that notification stood modified, and the Tribunal held that, in view of that order, the objection based on non-challenge to the notification could not sustain the rejection of refund.
Conclusion: The refund claim was held admissible and the appellant succeeded.