Court approves Composite Scheme of Arrangement for multiple companies under Companies Act, addressing compliance and benefiting stakeholders.

The court sanctioned a Composite Scheme of Arrangement involving demerger, transfer, amalgamation, and restructuring of share capital among multiple companies under relevant sections of the Companies Act. Compliance issues were addressed, including rectifying non-compliance with statutory requirements and making necessary amendments to the scheme. The court approved the scheme, finding it beneficial to stakeholders and the public, with associated costs quantified. Directions were given for record preservation, compliance with statutory liabilities, and filing necessary documents with authorities within specified timelines.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Sanction of a Composite Scheme of Arrangement involving demerger, transfer, amalgamation, and restructuring of share capital.
2. Compliance with statutory requirements and addressing the observations of the Regional Director.
3. Amendments to the Scheme and their implications.
4. Directions for preserving records and compliance with statutory liabilities.
5. Approval of the Scheme and associated costs.

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Sanction of a Composite Scheme of Arrangement:
The petitions were filed for sanctioning a Composite Scheme of Arrangement involving demerger and transfer of the Demerged Undertakings, amalgamation of the Residue Undertaking, and restructuring of share capital among Aura Securities Private Limited, Anagram Knowledge Academy Limited, Mayur Prakash Trading & Commercial Private Limited, and Avadh Material & Equipment Suppliers Private Limited under Sections 391 to 394, 78, and 100 to 103 of the Companies Act 1956 and Section 52 of the Companies Act 2013. The scheme aimed to segregate trading and investment activities from coaching and training activities to streamline operations, reduce managerial overlaps, and achieve economies of scale.

2. Compliance with Statutory Requirements:
The Regional Director observed several compliance issues:
- Non-compliance with Section 89 of the Companies Act, 2013 by two Petitioner Companies for filing e-form MGT6, which the companies undertook to rectify within a month.
- Non-compliance with AS_1 by Anagram Knowledge Academy Limited due to accumulated losses exceeding the capital base, which would be addressed by bringing in additional capital.
- The NBFC status of Aura Securities Private Limited and the need for RBI guidelines compliance post-scheme.
- Specific accounting treatments proposed under the scheme were permissible, with disclosures to be made in the first financial statements post-scheme sanction.
- Non-disclosure of assets and liabilities of the Demerged Undertakings, which was later rectified by submitting unaudited balance sheets and undertaking to provide a complete list of immovable assets at the scheme's sanction date.

3. Amendments to the Scheme:
Amendments were proposed to change the Appointed Date from 1st April 2016 to 1st July 2016 and to modify the accounting treatment in the books of Avadh. The amendments were based on the Statutory Auditor's recommendations and were supported by fresh consent letters from all shareholders. The amendments did not affect the rights and interests of any concerned parties and were granted in the interest of justice.

4. Directions for Preserving Records and Compliance with Statutory Liabilities:
The Official Liquidator requested that the Transferee Company preserve the books of accounts and records of the Transferor Company for eight years from the date of scheme sanctioning. The court directed the petitioner companies to comply with this request and ensure all statutory liabilities were met.

5. Approval of the Scheme and Associated Costs:
The court, after considering all contentions and submissions, found that the observations made by the Regional Director had been satisfactorily addressed. The scheme, in its modified form, was deemed to be in the interest of shareholders, creditors, and the public. The court sanctioned the scheme, including the restructure of capital and the amendments sought. Costs were quantified at Rs. 7,500 per petition to be paid to the Central Government Standing Counsel and the Official Liquidator.

Conclusion:
The petitions were disposed of with directions to lodge a copy of the order and the detailed schedule of immovable assets with the concerned Superintendent of Stamps for stamp duty adjudication within 60 days. The petitioner companies were also directed to file a copy of the order and the modified scheme with the Registrar of Companies electronically and physically. The Registrar, High Court of Gujarat, was instructed to issue authenticated copies of the order and scheme expeditiously.

---