Appellant wins appeal against service tax liability for Mid Day Meals supplied to schools

The appellant was successful in challenging the demand for service tax liability for providing Mid Day Meals to schools under the category of "outdoor catering services" from March 2006 to March 2011. The Tribunal held that the appellant's role in preparing and supplying meals under the government scheme did not constitute outdoor catering services, as they were not involved in serving the meals at the schools. Therefore, the duty demand was deemed unsustainable, and the appeals were allowed. This case emphasizes the importance of analyzing specific activities and arrangements to determine tax liability accurately based on legal definitions and factual circumstances.

---

---

Issues:
Demand of service tax liability on the appellant for the period March 2006 to March 2011 under the category of "outdoor catering services."

Analysis:
The issue in these cases pertains to the demand of service tax liability on the appellant for providing Mid Day Meals to schools from March 2006 to March 2011 under the category of "outdoor catering services." The lower authorities concluded that the appellant was liable for service tax as they were providing meals to schools and receiving payment for the same. However, the appellant argued that they were not providing any service component as the schools/government did not provide infrastructure or necessary arrangements. The Tribunal referred to a previous case and held that the service tax liability did not arise for preparing and supplying food under the Mid Day Meal Scheme. The Tribunal noted that the appellant was simply preparing and supplying meals to the government as per the scheme, and since they were not involved in serving the meals at the schools, they did not fall under the definition of "outdoor caterer." Therefore, the duty demand on this count was deemed unsustainable, and the impugned orders were set aside, allowing the appeals.

This judgment highlights the importance of analyzing the specific activities and arrangements involved in providing services to determine the applicability of tax liability. It underscores the need to consider the nuances of the services provided and the relevant legal definitions to ascertain the tax implications accurately. The decision provides clarity on the scope of taxable services under the law and emphasizes the significance of factual circumstances in determining tax liability.

---