Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2009 (4) TMI 25 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        High Court upholds attachment of funds under Income Tax Act, emphasizing full disclosure and denying relief. The High Court dismissed the petition, upholding the attachment of money from the petitioner's bank account under the Income Tax Act. The Court found the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                          Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            High Court upholds attachment of funds under Income Tax Act, emphasizing full disclosure and denying relief.

                            The High Court dismissed the petition, upholding the attachment of money from the petitioner's bank account under the Income Tax Act. The Court found the petitioner liable as a guarantor for a loan, noted suppression of material facts, and rejected challenges against the attachment. Emphasizing the importance of full disclosure, the Court supported the decisions of the Tax Recovery Officer and Tribunal, denying relief to the petitioners.




                            Issues:
                            1. Attachment of money from a bank account under the Income Tax Act.
                            2. Dispute regarding the debt owed to a creditor.
                            3. Challenge against the notice and summons issued under the IT Act.
                            4. Liability of the petitioner as a guarantor for a loan.
                            5. Suppression of material facts by the petitioners.
                            6. Exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction by the Court.
                            7. Reference to a judgment by the Madhya Pradesh High Court.

                            Issue 1: Attachment of money from a bank account under the Income Tax Act
                            The Tax Recovery Officer held that the money attached from the bank account of the petitioner cannot be termed as wrong and hence cannot be refunded. The petitioners denied owing any amount to the creditor, but the Tax Recovery Officer based the decision on the debt owed by another company where a common director was involved.

                            Issue 2: Dispute regarding the debt owed to a creditor
                            The petitioner challenged the notice directing payment to a creditor under the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal noted that the petitioner had taken a loan and overdraft facility from a bank, and proceedings had been initiated against the creditor. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Tax Recovery Officer in declining to lift the attachment levied on the petitioners.

                            Issue 3: Challenge against the notice and summons issued under the IT Act
                            The petitioner and another company challenged the notice and summons issued to them under the IT Act. The Tribunal considered the contentions and the history of loan transactions between the parties, ultimately ruling in favor of upholding the attachment.

                            Issue 4: Liability of the petitioner as a guarantor for a loan
                            It was established that the petitioner acted as a guarantor for a loan taken by another company, and the debt remained outstanding. The petitioner had deposited a Fixed Deposit Receipt (FDR) before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) seeking withdrawal, but the Court did not find merit in the petitioner's arguments.

                            Issue 5: Suppression of material facts by the petitioners
                            The petitioners were found to have suppressed the fact that they had stood as guarantors for a loan, and the affidavit filed before the Tax Recovery Officer did not disclose crucial details regarding their financial obligations. This suppression of material facts influenced the Court's decision not to exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction in the case.

                            Issue 6: Exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction by the Court
                            The Court considered the exercise of its extraordinary jurisdiction based on the merits of the case and the suppression of material facts by the petitioners. Despite the arguments presented, the Court deemed it inappropriate to intervene given the circumstances and facts presented in the case.

                            Issue 7: Reference to a judgment by the Madhya Pradesh High Court
                            The counsel referred to a judgment by the Madhya Pradesh High Court regarding the obligation of the Recovery Officer to prove the falsity of an affidavit. However, the Court found that the facts before them clearly indicated a false affidavit was filed before the Tax Recovery Officer, leading to the dismissal of the petition.

                            In conclusion, the High Court dismissed the petition due to the petitioner's liability as a guarantor for a loan, the suppression of material facts, and the lack of merit in challenging the attachment under the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized the importance of disclosing all relevant information and upheld the decision of the Tax Recovery Officer and the Tribunal in maintaining the attachment.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found