Natural justice in pre-deposit disputes requires a fair hearing before dismissal, with merits reconsidered on remand.

The Tribunal held that dismissing the appeal for non-compliance with a pre-deposit direction, without granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing, violated natural justice. It also found that the stay order and the Commissioner (Appeals)' final order were unsustainable on that ground. As a substantial part of the duty demand had already been paid before the show cause notice, the matter required reconsideration on merits rather than further insistence on pre-deposit. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision after hearing the appellant.

---

---

Issues: Whether the order dismissing the appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit direction and the stay order were sustainable when passed without affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing.

Analysis: The Tribunal found that both the stay order and the final order of the Commissioner (Appeals) had been passed in violation of the principles of natural justice. Since a substantial part of the duty demand had already been paid before issuance of the show cause notice, the matter required reconsideration on merits after granting the appellant a reasonable opportunity of hearing, without insisting on further pre-deposit.

Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh decision on merits after hearing the appellant.

---