CESTAT Rejects Delay Applications, Considers Cross-Objections as Defense Arguments The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai rejected the department's applications for condonation of delay in filing cross-objections as no relief was sought. ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
CESTAT Rejects Delay Applications, Considers Cross-Objections as Defense Arguments
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai rejected the department's applications for condonation of delay in filing cross-objections as no relief was sought. The cross-objections were considered as the Revenue's arguments in defense of the impugned order. Appeals were scheduled for hearing on 12-3-2009.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai rejected the department's applications for condonation of delay in filing cross-objections as no relief was sought. The cross-objections were considered as the Revenue's arguments in defense of the impugned order. Appeals were scheduled for hearing on 12-3-2009.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.