Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sentence order required modification by reducing only the default sentence for non-payment of fine while leaving the minimum substantive sentence and fine intact.
Analysis: The conviction under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 was not challenged and stood affirmed. On sentence, the substantive imprisonment and fine could not be reduced as both were the minimum prescribed. However, considering the period already undergone and the relevant sentencing power, the default sentence for non-payment of fine was liable to be reassessed.
Conclusion: The sentence order was modified only to the extent that the default sentence for non-payment of fine was reduced to simple imprisonment for one month each under both offences, while the remaining terms of sentence were maintained.